@trashmonkey@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • 11 months agoJohnson & Johnson is trying to file for bankruptcy. They are taking it to the Supreme Court for protection against the litigation results of their products potentially causing cancer.www.thestreet.commessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1501arrow-down18
arrow-up1493arrow-down1external-linkJohnson & Johnson is trying to file for bankruptcy. They are taking it to the Supreme Court for protection against the litigation results of their products potentially causing cancer.www.thestreet.com@trashmonkey@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world • 11 months agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-square@EpeeGnome@lemmy.fmhy.netlinkfedilinkEnglish10•11 months agoYou’d think so, but that’s been a standard abbreviation around the Internet for at least 5 years.
minus-squareThe Pantserlinkfedilink7•11 months agoINAL would be less ANALy, I’m Not A Lawyer but I love IANAL because I have to stop and think about butts.
minus-squareares35linkfedilink10•11 months agoit’s a lot older than that. dates back to usenet, so three decades at least.
minus-squaremars296linkfedilink3•11 months agoQuestion is when it became “the standard”. We need an internet historian to weigh in.
minus-square@EpeeGnome@lemmy.fmhy.netlinkfedilinkEnglish1•11 months agoI figured it was longer, but I couldn’t be bothered to research it, so I could only speak from my own memory.
You’d think so, but that’s been a standard abbreviation around the Internet for at least 5 years.
INAL would be less ANALy, I’m Not A Lawyer but I love IANAL because I have to stop and think about butts.
Closer to 15
it’s a lot older than that. dates back to usenet, so three decades at least.
Question is when it became “the standard”. We need an internet historian to weigh in.
I figured it was longer, but I couldn’t be bothered to research it, so I could only speak from my own memory.